When I first started digging into Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics, I honestly didn’t expect to find so many small details that made a huge difference. What surprised me most is how similar it feels to picking out a pair of socks—the little choices you make end up shaping the whole look and how people react to it. From the first slide hook to the last vote on TikTok, the numbers really show us what holds people’s attention and what makes them skip away. I’ve personally tried running polls where outfits competed head-to-head, and trust me, when the sequence is designed well, the engagement feels almost like a conversation with your audience. That’s what makes these stats more than numbers—they’re insights into real human behavior and style preferences.
Top 20 Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics 2025 (Editor’s Choice)
# | Statistics Metric | Key Insights |
---|---|---|
1 | IG Stories Exit Rate (Slide 1) – 23.8% | Nearly one-fourth of viewers exit polls at the first slide, showing the need for strong hooks. |
2 | Exit Rate (Slide 2) – 20.5% | Engagement improves slightly if viewers pass the first vote screen. |
3 | Exit Rate (Slide 3) – 18.5% | Drop-off decreases as users become invested in the poll sequence. |
4 | Exit Rate (Slide 4) – 15.7% | Lower exits indicate higher engagement for mid-sequence outfit votes. |
5 | Exit Rate (Slide 9) – 13.3% | Audiences that stay this long are highly engaged in voting content. |
6 | Exit Rate (Slide 15) – 12.5% | Retention is strongest for long poll series, indicating loyal voters. |
7 | Tap-Forward (Images, 1–5K accounts) – 56.8% | More than half of users skip forward quickly, stressing creative design for image polls. |
8 | Tap-Forward (Videos, 1–5K accounts) – 50.5% | Videos hold attention slightly better than static outfit polls. |
9 | Tap-Forward (Images, 100K–1M accounts) – 66% | Larger accounts face higher skip rates, requiring better interactivity. |
10 | Tap-Forward (Videos, 100K–1M accounts) – 58% | Video outfit polls perform better than image-based polls at scale. |
11 | Stories Format Mix – 57% Images / 43% Video | Brands balance visual vs. motion polls to maximize audience votes. |
12 | Reach Rate (1-slide Stories) – 6.3% | Single-slide outfit polls capture only a small portion of followers. |
13 | Reach Rate (Slide 6) – 20.5% | Polls gain traction around the sixth slide, showing mid-sequence engagement. |
14 | Peak Reach (Slide 13) – 37.8% | Longest poll sequences maximize reach and votes. |
15 | Reach Rate (Slide 14) – 31.4% | Polls still capture nearly a third of followers late in the sequence. |
16 | Reach Rate (Slide 15) – 37.1% | Outfit polls can sustain engagement even across long sequences. |
17 | Instagram Engagement per Post – 0.5% | General engagement declined 28% YoY, affecting vote turnout. |
18 | Carousel Engagement – 0.55% | Carousel outfit polls perform better than single images. |
19 | Reels vs Images Engagement – 0.50% vs 0.45% | Video-based outfit polls outperform still images. |
20 | TikTok Brand Engagement – 2.2% | Short-form video polls drive stronger engagement than Instagram. |
Top 20 Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics 2025
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #1 – IG Stories Exit Rate (Slide 1) 23.8%
The first slide of any poll is the make-or-break moment for audience attention. With nearly one-fourth of viewers leaving at this point, it highlights the importance of strong visuals and engaging copy upfront. Outfit polls that lack an immediate hook often lose participation quickly. This statistic emphasizes the need for bold opening slides with clear voting options. Brands should treat the first frame as a headline moment to capture votes.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #2 – Exit Rate (Slide 2) 20.5%
By the second slide, drop-off decreases, showing that those who stay are slightly more engaged. This means once viewers commit beyond the first interaction, they are more likely to participate. Outfit polls that build anticipation or storylines benefit at this stage. Creators can use a sequence where outfit comparisons become progressively more interesting. Maintaining curiosity can reduce early exits even further.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #3 – Exit Rate (Slide 3) 18.5%
At the third slide, engagement stabilizes, with fewer users leaving. This indicates that participants are becoming more invested in the voting process. Outfit polls with varied styles or surprising combinations tend to keep voters longer. Keeping transitions smooth and storytelling consistent helps retain attention. This is the stage where committed voters solidify their interest.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #4 – Exit Rate (Slide 4) 15.7%
By the fourth slide, retention improves significantly. Audiences that stay this long are usually curious about the full sequence of outfit options. This statistic shows that mid-series polls can generate stronger participation than short polls. Outfits with seasonal or trending themes perform best at this point. Strong visuals with minimal text further enhance engagement.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #5 – Exit Rate (Slide 9) 13.3%
Nine slides into a poll, exit rates are much lower, showing strong viewer commitment. Only highly interested audiences remain at this stage. For outfit votes, this can be a golden point to ask for decisions on the boldest looks. The audience that stays this far is motivated and invested in fashion content. Brands can take advantage of this by including CTAs or links here.

Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #6 – Exit Rate (Slide 15) 12.5%
By the fifteenth slide, exits are minimal. This proves that loyal followers will stay engaged even during long sequences. Outfit vote polls with engaging storytelling can successfully maintain interest across many slides. This also suggests the potential of extended campaigns rather than quick polls. Long-format polls may work well for fashion drops or multi-look styling contests.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #7 – Tap-Forward Rate (Images, Small Accounts) 56.8%
Over half of users quickly skip through image-based outfit polls from smaller accounts. This reflects a need for sharper creative designs to hold attention. Outfits must be eye-catching enough to stop the tap-forward action. Using bold contrasts and simple layouts can improve retention. Smaller creators should also experiment with captions or stickers to slow skipping.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #8 – Tap-Forward Rate (Videos, Small Accounts) 50.5%
Videos retain slightly more viewers compared to static image outfit polls. This demonstrates the value of motion in keeping audiences engaged. Even short video snippets of outfits can reduce quick exits. Small accounts benefit greatly by mixing in video polls. Movement creates curiosity, leading to longer participation in outfit voting.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #9 – Tap-Forward Rate (Images, Large Accounts) 66%
Larger accounts face higher skip rates on image-based outfit polls. Audiences often skim through because they expect fast content. This suggests that even big brands must innovate to hold attention. Image polls should be combined with strong storytelling to avoid disengagement. The high skip rate signals the need for more interactive formats.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #10 – Tap-Forward Rate (Videos, Large Accounts) 58%
Video polls perform better than static images at scale. Even among large audiences, movement and transitions hold attention longer. This shows how video storytelling can strengthen outfit voting engagement. Brands should prioritize reels or short-form videos over stills. Creative use of outfit transitions can make polls feel more dynamic.

Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #11 – Stories Format Mix (57% Images / 43% Video)
Brands currently balance between image and video formats in polls. This mix shows that both have value in engaging different audience types. Video drives longer participation, while images offer quick, simple voting. A balanced approach ensures maximum coverage. Testing ratios can help optimize engagement further.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #12 – Reach Rate (1-Slide Stories) 6.3%
Single-slide outfit polls reach only a small share of followers. This limits engagement and restricts meaningful feedback. Audiences tend to engage more with multi-slide formats. Poll creators should avoid one-off posts if aiming for higher participation. Sequenced stories can build momentum and improve reach.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #13 – Reach Rate (Slide 6) 20.5%
At six slides in, polls gain traction with greater reach. This shows that audiences warm up gradually into participation. Outfit polls that are too short miss this sweet spot. Mid-sequence designs with stylish outfit contrasts encourage more votes. It highlights the importance of poll length and pacing.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #14 – Peak Reach (Slide 13) 37.8%
The thirteenth slide often sees the highest reach rate. This reflects deep audience investment in longer outfit voting sequences. Fashion content that extends this far builds strong momentum. Brands can place their most impactful outfits or promotions here. This peak demonstrates the benefit of extended storytelling.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #15 – Reach Rate (Slide 14) 31.4%
Even at the fourteenth slide, nearly a third of audiences remain engaged. This suggests audiences will stay longer for compelling polls. Fashion polls with strong thematic ties benefit the most at this stage. Continuing variety in outfits sustains curiosity. The late-stage reach shows long-form polls can still perform well.

Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #16 – Reach Rate (Slide 15) 37.1%
At slide fifteen, engagement remains strong. This suggests audiences who persist are deeply interested in the poll outcome. Outfit contests that place dramatic styles here can maximize attention. Polls that build suspense are rewarded with higher late engagement. It demonstrates the power of narrative structure in polling.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #17 – Instagram Engagement Per Post 0.5%
Overall Instagram engagement has declined, dropping 28% YoY. This impacts all content types, including outfit polls. Creators need to innovate to stand out in crowded feeds. Poll interactivity is one way to combat falling engagement. Outfit votes may drive more clicks compared to static posts.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #18 – Carousel Engagement 0.55%
Carousel posts see higher engagement compared to single images. For outfit polls, carousels allow multiple looks in one post. This format encourages swiping and extended interaction. Brands can showcase styling variations and capture more votes. Carousels are effective for multi-look outfit engagement.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #19 – Reels Vs Images Engagement 0.50% Vs 0.45%
Reels outperform images in engagement rate. Outfit vote polls in video format benefit from this trend. Motion helps fashion content feel dynamic and engaging. Viewers are more likely to vote when they see styling in action. This reinforces the importance of video in social voting.
Public Outfit Vote Engagement Statistics #20 – TikTok Brand Engagement 2.2%
TikTok drives stronger engagement compared to Instagram polls. Short-form video format naturally supports outfit voting content. Audiences interact quickly and in higher numbers. Fashion polls thrive on TikTok due to its viral nature. This makes it a key platform for public outfit voting campaigns.

Why These Stats Matter To Me
Looking at all these stats together, I can’t help but feel like they’re a mirror of how people enjoy fashion in real life—quick opinions, a little curiosity, and a lot of personality in how they vote. For me, the real takeaway is that engagement is never about the platform alone; it’s about how you tell the story and keep people interested along the way. Just like I wouldn’t throw on mismatched socks without thinking about the vibe, I’ve learned not to throw up polls without planning the flow. Seeing how audiences stick around slide after slide reminds me that when we invest in presentation, people invest back with their votes. And honestly, that kind of shared interaction is what keeps me excited to keep testing, styling, and engaging with outfit polls in new ways.
SOURCES
https://www.socialinsider.io/social-media-benchmarks/instagram-stories-benchmarks?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://sproutsocial.com/insights/tiktok-stats/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://stackinfluence.com/2025-social-media-algorithm-changes-engagement/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://theinfluencermarketingfactory.com/tiktok-instagram-er/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.rivaliq.com/blog/social-media-industry-benchmark-report/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.dashsocial.com/blog/every-instagram-stories-performance-benchmark-you-need-to-know?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/how-to-analyze-instagram-stories-7-metrics-to-track/?utm_source=chatgpt.com